備考雅思寫作必備的大綱

在備考雅思寫作考試的時候，各位考生有準備大綱嗎?或者在我們寫任何一篇文章的時候都有列提綱嗎?我們都知道，一個合理優秀的提綱會不僅會減少寫作時間，更能明確自己要寫的內容。所以寫作大綱是我們每一個考試生都必須要會的技能。下面我們來看看到底該怎麼準備一篇寫作大綱，本站整理如下。

備考雅思寫作必備的大綱

瞭解雅寫作考試的內容和模式

雅思Writing Task 2所佔的分數比例比Writing Task1高，難度和對於英語水平的要求都比較高。花在Task1的建議時間是20分鐘，而花在Task2的建議時間是40分鐘，但也應留小量時間在最後階段作最後檢查。在Task2這一部份，必須寫一篇至少250字的評論或報告，測試的不只是考生的寫作能力，同時考察考生的思考和判斷能力，因此考生們應該對一些社會新聞和常識有一定的認識和見解。

二、明確寫作步驟

1. 分析題目

Writing Task2的問題可分爲兩類。第一類問題需要以討論形式作答，需要講出正反兩面雙方的論點和自己的立場。可以設想這是一場辯論比賽，但要爲兩方發言，考生要寫出足夠的證據支持自己的論點和反駁對立的論點。第二類問題是以報告形式作答，需要多描述和發掘有關題目的處境，並不需要太着重寫自己的意見，應描述有關題目的處境和發掘事件的成因。雖然並不需要支持正/反一方的論點，但應在真實的處境上提出真實的證據。

2. 考慮答案

在考慮答案時，應能想到兩個或以上的論據支持自己的論點，這步驟被稱爲“Brainstorming”。考生可在一張白紙上寫下所有在腦中浮現的文字，先不用理會寫下的是否有用，可將題目也寫在紙上，然後在圍繞題目的地方將所寫下的文字分門別類。在第一類問題上，應至少想到2個或以上的支持論據，而在第二類問題上，也應至少想到2個或以上可供討論的話題，但無論是回答哪一類問題，不建議寫超過4個論據或話題，否則由於字數的限制，文章會變得太空泛。

3. 計劃和組織答案

考生或許沒有時間完整寫出計劃，但必須在心裏組織和安排好答案。主要需要安排好4部分：

1)題目和問題-要認清題目的要求和找出題目中想問的問題;

2)介紹-這是用來表達文章的大意，如果要寫的是一篇評論文，筆者的方向也要在這裏表達出來;

3)主體-如主體分爲三段的話，通常前兩段是觀點和理由，後一段是用來平衡討論的相反觀點;

4)結論-會包括一點比較次要的觀點。

4. 寫答案

在一篇250字的文章中，介紹文應占大約40個字而結論文應占大約30個字。當計劃好後，便可以開始作答。

1)介紹(Introduction)

介紹文是一篇文章的“地圖”，用來提導讀者方向。介紹文中第一句的作用是用來說明整篇文章的總義和介紹文章的主題。之後的一至兩句則是用來表達自己的個人意見(評論文)或支持論點的客觀事實(報告)，通常介紹文的最後一句是用來引出主體文。

2)主體(Body)

與介紹文一樣，主體文每段的第一句都是用來說明整段的大意，之後的內容可用連接詞(如However, Although, Not only, Also, Even though, Consequently, In addition等等)或順序詞(Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly...)連貫在一起。

在一篇文章中，連接詞儘量不要重複。如提出了一個論點，在同一段落裏必須有支持這個論點的理由和證據，每段的最後一句通常用來總結整段的意思。在一篇評論文中，必須有一段相反論點以平衡整個討論，在這一段裏，必須能有理地反駁這些相反論點，講出爲什麼要持相反意見。可強烈地、溫和地或只是部分地反對。

3)結論(Conclusion)

結論文的開始通常都會用一個特別結論句式(In general, To sum up, To conclude, In conclusion等等)來串聯整段。在結論文中，條件句(Conditional sentence)(If...., ....)是非常有用的。當然，在文章的其他位置也可以用條件句，使用條件句時，須注意有沒有文法錯誤。

雅思寫作範文：記者的品格

We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we can't trust the journalist, what do u think? And what do you think are the important qualities that a journalist should have?

我們能從新聞中學到知識，但有人認爲我們不能相信記者，你的看法呢?你認爲記者應該有哪些重要的品格?

思路解析：

問題1： 過於依賴網絡，不出去挖掘和發現新聞，總是拷貝和轉發別人的文章，缺乏原創性。

問題2： 不客觀。舉例，很多記者草率的使用那些來源不可靠的信息，這會造成謠言四起。

問題3： 缺乏職業道德。舉例，很多記者受賄了。他們隱瞞真相，誤導大衆，這嚴重破壞了社會媒體的民主和公平。

素質1： 要有熱情。記者應該到事件現場去深入瞭解情況，掌握第一手的資料。

素質2： 要有責任心。舉例，記者應該參與到第一線來收集新聞和線索，這有利於還原真相。

素質3： 要有職業操守。舉例，記者應該把社會利益放到自我利益之前，富貴不能淫。

參考範文：

Nowadays, the journalists are losing the prestige in the public because fewer people trust them. In my opinion, this trend is caused by some ill behaviors of them. The reasons and the good qualities of a journalist will be presents as below.

I have to concede that a large proportion of journalists are under the standards of journalism ethics, which leads to the public concerns of the qualities of news in media. Firstly, with the great convenience provided by the Internet, journalists can have an easy access to acquiring all kinds of information. Some of them then begin to repetitively copy or reproduce the news report from certain websites only by clicking the mouse in the office, instead of going outside for practical research. That is to say, these journalists are too lazy to write the original and in-depth news reports.

In addition, the lack of responsibility among journalists also contributes to the news crisis. For example, some of them write and report news by depending on unreliable information sources, so that newspapers and TVs are full of data mistakes and lies. Moreover, influential media are viewed as rumormongers, because they spread false news of natural disasters, social epidemics or terrorist attacks, incurring unnecessary panics in the public. The most worrying aspect is news objectiveness. In many cases of news crimes, bribed news editors cover and twist the truth of social issues, which misleads the public judgment, as well as damages the equity and democracy of social media.

In order to recover the faith and confidence of audience for news media, many good standards of journalist should be built up and tested. Firstly, journalists should have the professional dedication, which means a strong willing to go into the frontline of events, and make efforts of exploring and collecting the firsthand news materials. By this way, the high values of news reports can be ensured. Secondly, high-level work moralities are a must, including honesty, integrity, and law-abiding awareness. These traits can improve the immunity of news practicers from the lure of money. Besides, journalists should learn to give the priority to the social benefits, over the individual media benefits. In other words, what they report on media should be accurate, objective and accountable, rather than publishing untrue news only for attracting more audience.

In conclusion, there are many reasons why massive news media become more untrustful in the public, mainly including the loss of work passion and obligation. For the purpose of curing these ill journalists, some good qualities should be cultivated and encouraged, like the dedication, righteousness and carefulness.

(429 words)

雅思寫作範文：青少年罪犯是否該判刑

Task：Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

思路解析：

1. 應該，嚴肅的法律能起到一種威懾作用，讓青少年們不敢再次犯罪。舉例，今天我們對於青少年罪犯的法律懲罰實在是不痛不癢，甚至是太仁慈了，這讓年輕人藐視法律，他們會想，即使犯罪也沒什麼大不。所以像成年人那樣懲罰他們很必要，比如說關監獄，而不是簡單地口頭教導。這些痛苦的懲罰讓年輕人不敢隨便挑戰社會法規。

2. 然而，年輕人的司法體系應該更加靈活一些，這是因爲年輕人很年輕，不成熟，他們的犯罪動機很可能不是那麼邪惡。舉例，成年罪犯的搶劫動機很明確，就是通過襲擊他人來獲取財富。相比之下，青少年傷害他人的行爲很可能只是因爲來自同伴的壓力，或是因爲一時衝動。考慮到他們並不是有意要犯罪，所以給他們較輕的判罰是可以理解的。

參考範文：

Should young criminals be punished on the same level of adults, as some people argue? Personally, I agree with is assertion partially, while it underestimates the importance of a flexible judgment on youngsters.

The main reason of using the same standard to punish the youth is, it deters them from further crimes. Today, the main cause of juvenile crimes increasing is a lenient juvenile judicial system and milder punishments like lighter sentences, shortened prison terms, or even probation. Youngsters think they can always get off easily, regardless the seriousness of crimes. Therefore, it is necessary for juvenile offenders to be tried as strictly as adults, which lets these youngsters know that they are not exempt from heavy penalties, and not given any special consideration because of their age factor. By this way, their desires of making illegal activities would be inhibited.

However, to a large extent, juvenile judicial system should be flexible. Psychologically speaking, youngsters under the age of 18 are immature, with less social experience and concepts about social rules, or with no recognition about the consequence. In many cases, young criminals have no idea that what they do is illegal. For example, compared with adult criminals who have the definite plans and goals to make money by hunting or killing victims, the testimony of many teenage thieves and robbers proves that their movements are purposeless, and the main reasons for them to do so are no more than peer pressure and impulsiveness. Therefore, when it comes to the fact that adult criminals are intentional but young ones are unintentional, it is reasonable to treat and trial them differently.

In conclusion, a flexible juvenile judicial system should be encouraged. Although a strict punishment to young offenders as adults might be a profound education for young generations, sentences on young offenders should be lighter, considering the fact that their intentions of breaking law are fundamentally different from that of adults.

(320 words)